« Do people of 2100 have a "right" to be "pretty angry" about global warming? | Main | Jobs vulnerable to artificial intelligence, part 2 »

May 16, 2014

Comments

Mike Patterson

Hi Mark,

I've been digging into your comments on Cook et. al. (2013) and love how you focused on the separate issues of data, analysis/interpretation and presentation.

I built a chart based on the data and comments you included in your Feb. 28, 2014 post on a David Henderson post (https://www.econlib.org/archives/2014/02/david_friedman_14.html) and would love to get your thoughts on this chart. Do you have Twitter account? Or can I email it to you? My email is: mike.patterson@videotron.ca.

Also, a question on the actual dataset from the Cook et. al. study: Why are there two codes in the Endorsement box for each abstract? The two codes (e.g., 2,2) are sometimes the same but often different. Does this mean that each abstract had two reviewers?

Thanks

Mike

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

January 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad